会员登录 - 用户注册 - 设为首页 - 加入收藏 - 网站地图 Sanctuary cities executive order ruled unconstitutional by appeals court.!

Sanctuary cities executive order ruled unconstitutional by appeals court.

时间:2024-09-22 10:09:46 来源:摩登家庭人人影视网 作者:关于我们 阅读:893次

A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration’s executive order that threatened to withhold funds for sanctuary cities is unconstitutional, according to the Associated Press.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an earlier district judge’s ruling that the president had exceeded his authority, but it removed that judge’s nationwide injunction, ruling that there was not enough evidence of the executive order having an impact on the rest of the country outside California to justify a nationwide injunction, according to the Los Angeles Times. Instead, the appeals court left the injunction intact only in California, where, it ruled, individual counties and the state itself appeared to be more directly targeted by the executive order.

Advertisement

That rationale was based on language Trump and others in his administration used to criticize California’s immigration policies and attitudes and those of individual California cities and counties. The attorneys for the government had unsuccessfully argued that the judge should ignore comments by the president when ruling on the executive order.

Trump issued the executive order just five days after taking office. The order vowed to “ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law,” but it was its section making “sanctuary jurisdictions” ineligible to receive federal grants that formed the crux of the constitutional debate.

Trump was following through on campaign promises, and he had in his earlier rhetoric positioned California as his enemy in the immigration debate. The administration has also sued California over other laws passed to protect undocumented immigrants.

In response to his executive order, San Francisco and Santa Clara counties sued the administration. U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick in San Francisco ruled in their favor, finding that the executive order had been too broad and had unconstitutionally placed conditions on federal funding—something only Congress can do. Wednesday’s decision, with a 2–1 ruling, agreed with this assessment.

Tweet Share Share Comment

(责任编辑:资讯)

相关内容
  • The Best AMD Ryzen Gaming Laptops (So Far)
  • 道路提升工程有序推进 沿线避暑旅游依旧火热
  • 鑷村尃蹇億鍔冲姩鑰呯殑灏婁弗
  • 第二十二届广东种业大会佛山分会场12月5日启幕(良种良法篇)
  • What Ever Happened to Winamp?
  • 青岛开发区联通健步走宣传宽带提速“三承诺”
  • 强降雨天气引发我市多处垮方  目前暂未收到人员伤亡信息
  • 油价迎四连涨!加满一箱多花4块钱
推荐内容
  • How do you make safe, cheap nuclear reactors? Bury them a mile deep
  • 海尔热水器为用户提供高品质洗浴体验的 7个依据
  • 未来两天 雨水稍有停歇
  • 恭喜!28人在2023年云浮市中药实用型技能竞赛中获奖
  • Google is bringing AI summaries to ‘Files’ so you can find your docs quicker
  • 万科回应宝能华润反对声明:将做好协商沟通